| Should Christians Observe Every Law of Moses? | ||
|
(By Felicia Trecek 2010)
There is a large movement occurring in these last days to discredit the New Testament (NT). Some people say that the NT can't be trusted. Other's say that it is full of lies. And, it has also been said that the Catholic Church changed text and manipulated the NT to fit their own belief system. I don't believe any of these said three statements. Yahushua Messiah - the Christ, is the ONLY Name in which we can be saved (ref: John 2:23). And, He came in the flesh. I don't believe that the Father in Heaven is too weak that He can't preserve a written record of the coming of Christ, His only begotten Son, which we need for our eternal life! Neither the Father in Heaven, nor the Son - Messiah, the Christ - are too weak that they are unable to circumvent the actions of mere mortal men. Where is the faith in HIS power? The NT is the written witness of Messiah and it also contains the terms of the NT covenant.
(I've already addressed the issue of the "Catholic Church" in a different article. So, I won't address it here. If you are interested, you can read my study: "The Peshitta and Aramaic NT".) I have learned in my many years of bible study that when scriptures don't fit a person's doctrinal premise, many people usually immediately dismiss the scripture as being faulty rather than question their doctrinal premise. Human nature doesn't like being wrong.
Because many people now believe that the new testament is faulty, these same people believe that we must observe ALL of the Mosaic laws and that none of them are null and void. Of course this belief is in opposition to the new testament. It's in opposition to large portions of the NT such as Hebrews chapter ten and more. But, I will demonstrate from the old testament (OT) that the New Testament (NT) is legitimate. The saints - who are within the NT contract - are not required to follow all of the Mosaic mandates; most notably, the animal sacrifices.
Since this is somewhat of a long study; because I plan to cover a large amount of scriptures, I will first summarize what I plan on delineating. Doing it this way, I hope that this study will be easier to understand. However, whether you agree or not is up to you.
PRE-SUMMARY There are more than "two" main covenants in the bible. There are actually THREE main covenants. I say, "main" because there are actually more than three covenants if you understand the OT. There were covenants before Moses, and there were two covenants with the children of Israel while they were wandering about in the wilderness (ref: Deut 29:1). But, for the sake of reference only, I will lump the wilderness ones together and call it the OT covenant/contract - the first covenant - due to Galatians 4:22-31. But, I'll need to dissect the two wilderness covenants later. Please keep it in mind.
There are certain laws that are contained in all three covenants that are the same. But, there are also certain laws that are not contained in all three covenants. This is where some of the controversy exists, but not limited to. The first covenant (OT covenant) has been annulled. This is where the rest of the controversy exists. There is a growing number of people that now believe that the OT wilderness covenant remains in effect in its entirety. However, there are five different scriptures in the OT that demonstrate that the Mosaic covenant has been annulled. (I will present five scriptures from the OT showing this fact, but this doesn't mean that there are a limit of five.) The second covenant - Messiah's will/testament - is current. This covenant will determine who will become a heir with Messiah and be in the first resurrection. The third - the peace covenant - occurs at the time of the second resurrection. The people that arise in the second resurrection have not accepted Messiah. For this reason, the "school-master" -which includes the animal sacrifices- must be implemented once again (ref: Gal 3:24).
PART 1: THERE ARE JOTS AND TITTLES THAT ARE NOW NULL AND VOID IN THE OT WILDERNESS COVENANT PROVEN FROM THE OT
After Messiah died on the cross, the Mosaic covenant/contract that the Israelites were mandated to keep, became null and void. Although, YHWH didn't dismiss the covenant/contract without first fulfilling it. The OT Israelites were never capable of fulfilling it. For this reason, it became Messiah's responsibility to fulfill it. And, He did. Zechariah chapter 11 prophesied when Messiah was on the cross. Zechariah 11:4a,10-14 reads,
Zechariah has CLEAR language. YHWH broke His covenant with all the people on that day. (If you don't believe that it was YHWH who broke the covenant, then you need to read the previous verses.) That "day" spoken of in Zechariah 11:10-14 was the day Messiah died on the cross. How could YHWH break His own covenant/contact without being in violation Himself...not being a law breaker as like were the Israelites? It's simple, Christ fulfilled it then He died. Whenever there is a marriage covenant/contract between a man and a woman and one of them dies, the contract becomes null and void. Paul explained this in Romans 7:1-2. The Word - the Personage - who became Christ, was 'married' to the nation of Israel (Jer 3:20, Jer 31:31-33). When He (The Word-of-YHWH) died on the cross, the contract was completely broken, null and void. Romans 7:1-2 reads,
All of the people that do not believe Messiah pre-existed will not accept this fact. But, He was the One who the Israelites contracted with in the desert, the very One who became their husband. For example: when Moses was atop Mount Sinai in Exodus 34:9, Moses was speaking to the One Personage that became Messiah - the Christ. Moses was pleading for the people and Moses said, "Forgive our crookedness and our sin, and take us as Your inheritance." Firstly, this statement was prophetic of Messiah. Secondly, use some simple logic here, please. If the Personage was the Most High Father that Moses was speaking with, then why would Moses say, "take us as Your inheritance?" The Most High Father doesn't inherit the Israelites, people that He already owns. An inheritance is normally received by either a son or a daughter - an heir. Therefore, the Personage atop the mountain with Moses was the One who became Messiah/Christ - the Son. Because, Messiah/Christ is the inheritor of all. In this case, Messiah received a living inheritance since the Father Most High never died. Nevertheless, Messiah - the Son - is the inheritor of all (ref: Hebrews 1:2, Ps 2:7-8) and He inherits the physical children of Israel. When Messiah died on the cross, He was no longer married to them. But, He will acquire them again later.
I am prepared to present four more witnesses within the OT that demonstrates an annulling of the death OT covenant for those that might remain skeptical.
The ancient Israelites understood more about their covenant than most people do today. They understood that they possessed the "DEATH-COVENANT". In Isaiah 28:14-18, the ancient Israelites were complaining about it. (I will quote Isaiah 28:14-18 from the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible. However, the English translations of the Masoretic text concur with the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible.) Isaiah 28:14-18 reads,
The Israelites were complaining. They understood they contracted with 'death'. So they contrived to tell lies in hope to obtain a better future. But, YHWH educated them a bit. He informed them of the coming precious cornerstone - the Messiah (ref: Matt 21:42, Acts 4:11, etc.). Then, YHWH informed them that their covenant-of-death would be annulled. Yes, the OT death/slavery covenant through Moses has been annulled!!
Before I elaborate on the lies; which is important to understand for this study, I want to explain further why the rulers of Israel/Judah most likely called this "covenant" the "death-covenant" aside from the fact that they were omitted from the NT covenant due to the choices they made. Death was constant. Every day and every day those priests were mandated to kill animals. Animals had to be slaughtered for all types of reasons. They had to drain the blood, sprinkle blood, cut the animal up, etc. (I seriously wonder if they had a pesty fly problem from all the slaughtering.) Hence, it was appropriate for the ancient Israelites to refer to this covenant as the "death covenant."
WHAT WAS THIS LIE SPOKEN OF IN ISAIAH 28:14-18? The ancient Israelites were manipulating the Words of YHWH - adding, subtracting, and changing the text (ref: Jer 8:8-9) in hopes that it would be in their favor. According to the writings of Irenaeus (who was the apostle of Polycarp, the apostle of John), the OT scriptures were so full of lies that YHWH told Ezra to rewrite them all. But, the lies never ceased. Irenaeus and some other second and third century Apostolic Fathers said that the house of Judah took-out plain scriptures about Messiah's first coming in the OT. The rulers of the house of Judah in the first century wove a web of lies. When Messiah came, they even coveted after what was allotted to Messiah. And, they aimed to get it through deceit! Matthew 21:33-43 tells us that they wanted to STEAL Messiah's inheritance! In order to steal His inheritance - so they thought, they had to kill Him. (This is ultimate greed and madness.) This said clandestinity is the extention of the lie spoken of in Isaiah 28:14-18. And, because of this lie - along with the rest of their wickedness, they were cast out of the first resurrection, the kingdom. They are no longer the first-fruits of His increase (ref: Jer 2:3).
The first century leaders of the house of Judah contrived a bunch of lies in order to discredit Messiah. Their lies is what led to His death. Of course; if Messiah is discredited, then all of the sacrificial laws (plus the OT covenants) must remain in affect or else their clandestine stance would crumble. Down through the ages, the lies have taken on many surreptitious forms and now have filtered into the Messiah/Christ believing groups of people.
TO THE CONTRARY In plain language, Psalm 40:6-9 says that the animal sacrifices are now NOT required. But, let's read a passage in the book of Daniel first. In Daniel 9:24-27 we see that the sacrifices and (fleshly) offerings have ceased. (The quote from Daniel will be presented in black text and my comments and explanation in blue-text.) Daniel 9:25-27 reads,
Psalm 40:6-9 reads,
Please know this: I copied and pasted Psalms 40:6-9 from the Hebrew online bible. This translation is straight from the Jews who do not accept Messiah! (ref: http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt2640.htm)
In Psalm 40:6-9, YHWH opened David's ears. David really wasn't deaf. This is an idiom and it means that YHWH gave David understanding. David wrote about the Messiah's first coming. King David finally understood that YHWH doesn't like those animal sacrifices! The phrase, "burnt-offering and sin-offering hast Thou NOT required" was yet futuristic when these words were penned. We know that they were required in the Mosaic covenant. Therefore, this said phrase was futuristic of the time when Messiah died on the cross. For then it says, "Lo, I am come with the roll of a book which is prescribed for Me..." Messiah came, He declared faithfulness, righteousness, mercy, and truth to the great multitudes of people just as Psalms 40:6-9 pre-declared!
Those animal sacrifices foreshadowed Messiah's sacrifice. ALL of the animal sacrifices foreshadowed Messiah's sacrifice, just not the sacrifices for sin, because, Psalm 40:6-9 includes meal offerings, burnt offerings and sin-offerings. This verse is not constrained to sin offerings. Messiah BECAME all of those sacrifices. He came to free the Israelites from the covenant-of-death; free anyone who was/is willing to accept Messiah's sacrifice and believe! Although, there are many people who have not accepted Messiah's sacrifice and do not believe. But, for those who do believe - the animal sacrifices ceased to be of value, as like candles are of no comparison when the sun has arisen.
I now want to make another comment about Daniel 9. I chose to wait until now because I thought it was important for you to read Psalm 40:6-9 first. And; now that you have, I want you to please notice Daniel 9:18-22. Daniel was praying FOR FORGIVENESS OF SINS for himself and for the whole nation of Israel. While he was yet praying, Gabriel came to him to declare the vision/prophesy that I already elaborated on. But, please notice WHEN Gabriel came to Daniel. The timing was prophetic. Gabriel came about the time of the evening sacrifice when Daniel was praying for forgiveness of sins. This is the very time Gabriel prophesied Messiah's coming. The evening sacrifice would have been the last mandated sacrifice for the day. And, this said vision/prophesy of Messiah's first coming coincided with the LAST OFFERING. The timing stated is a hidden message that the sacrificial offerings were going to end. The official time when the sacrifices were no longer required is when Messiah/Christ died on the cross. Although, because the Jewish leaders during the first century didn't accept Messiah, they continued the animal sacrifices until they destroyed their own Temple in 70 A.D. The Jewish leadership refused to believe. Just as like they refuse to believe and accept Psalm 40:6-9 in their own book.
I will now quote Jeremiah 31, but before I do, please know that the Israelites broke (or rather, violated) the covenant/contract many times before Christ died on the cross. This is an important fact to know so that you don't get it confused with Zechariah 11:10-14 when I quote Jeremiah 31:31-34. It reads,
There are two covenants being spoken of in Jeremiah 31:31-34. YHWH made a covenant with the Israelites when He brought them out of Egypt, and He will make another one with them in the future. However; the words, "NOT according to the covenant that I made with their fathers" demonstrates that this said covenant would not last forever. It is currently null and void. But, the new covenant that YHWH speaks about in Jeremiah 31:31-34 is actually the "Peace-Covenant" that will occur in the future at the second resurrection. How do I know this? Verse 34 reveals this fact.... EVERYONE shall know YHWH AND their sins would be forgiven. Currently; everyone does not know YHWH, and He hasn't forgiven the entire nation of Israel yet for their sins. The Israelites broke their OT covenants and even many NT believers have broken the everlasting NT covenant. Both houses of Israel have transgressed the teachings and changed the laws of YHWH in one form or another - both in the OT and the NT. Therefore, YHWH is going to pour out His wrath upon this earth and few men shall be left alive (ref: Isaiah 24:5-6). This is the reason for the wrath of YHWH!
YHWH will give the Israelites a new heart and a new Spirit within them so that they can keep His laws, not the OT covenants. There is a difference between "LAWS" and a "COVENANT/CONTRACT".
PART 2: THERE ARE JOTS AND TITTLES THAT ARE NOW NULL AND VOID IN THE OT PROVEN FROM THE NT
Messiah said in Matthew 5:17-19, "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven." Based upon this said passage of scripture alone, it appears at face value that Christians/believers-in-Messiah are bound to observe the entire law of Moses until heaven and earth pass away. Many people believe Messiah's statement includes the sacrificial and levitical laws, and all of the other jots and tittles.
Is the phrase, "Till heaven and earth pass" a hyperbole to demonstrate how binding the entire law of Moses is UNTIL all is fulfilled? I posed this question since scripture informs us that the saints will inherit the earth. (Ref: Matthew 5:5, Psalms 25:13, 37:9, etc.) Based upon the inheritance promise, I don't believe the earth will pass away. YHWH will refresh the earth, but the earth remains. Additionally, Jerusalem will be the Throne of YHWH. For these said reasons, "Till heaven and earth pass" is a hyperbole to demonstrate how binding the entire law of Moses was UNTIL all was fulfilled. (Messiah made this said statement during His ministry, BEFORE He died.)
If the sacrificial and levitical laws did not become null and void at the cross, then a BIG problem arises. Large sections of the NT are in conflict with Messiah's statement in Matthew 5:17-19, and certain OT scriptures are also in conflict such as Psalm 40:6-9. Are a bunch of sections in the NT fabricated lies? For example (but certainly not limited to): Hebrews chapter ten. No, the NT is not filled with lies. The NT is the fulfillment of what was prophesied in the OT. Christians are not bound or obligated to keep every jot and tittle of the entire Torah based upon the scriptures that I have already presented from the OT. Does this make Christ a liar? No, it doesn't based upon the considerations stated above.
Messiah said that He came to fulfill the laws. For the sake of our salvation, it was necessary for Christ to fulfill ALL of the laws (including the ten commandments) and all of the prophesies concerning Himself that prophesied His first coming. Therefore, He did. For this reason, Matthew 11:13 says,
All of the laws in the OT concerning the sacrificial and levitical laws were binding right-up to John the baptist who was a righteous levitical priest according to the law. He then ushered in Messiah/Christ - the King of Righteousness. (The ten commandments and some other laws remain in affect. For this reason, I'll dissect the OT in a subsequent section to demonstrate where the divisions of the 'covenants' are.)
In Luke 24:25-27, 43-47 Christ told His disciples the following:
The covenant of death was never meant to last forever. It was only meant to lead them to Messiah/Christ (ref: Gal 3:24-25). And, Romans 11:32 says that Elohim shut them all up in disobedience, so that He might show mercy to all. All of this was for one enormous lesson. It shows that we all need Christ/Messiah and NO ONE can save themselves by keeping the entire law outlined by Moses (ref: Deut 27:26).
In Galatians 3:16-19, the apostle Paul explained that the promises and covenant made with Abraham were meant to come through Messiah. And, the "LAW" that the Israelites were subjugated to (spoken of in Galatians 3:16-19) WAS ADDED because the Israelites transgressed. Now ask yourself, what did they transgress which required more laws? "Transgression" means they sinned, and there can only be sin when a law exists (ref: 1John 3:4). Hence-forth, there were a prior set of laws that the Israelites violated. But, due to this violation, more laws were mandated upon them. So, the laws that were ADDED are the ones that have now become NULL AND VOID. Galatians 3:16-19 reads,
The "law" that was added 430 later (ref: Ex 12:40-41) was meant to be in affect only UNTIL Messiah came in the flesh and died. (I'll delineate exactly what "law" was annulled in the subsequent section titled: "What Law Was Added 430 Later".)
In Acts 15:5, there were some Pharisees who became believers that rose up and said, "It is necessary to circumcise them (the gentile converts) and command them to keep the law of Moses." So these Pharisees not only thought circumcision was necessary, but they thought that keeping the entire law of Moses was also necessary. As you read the remainder of Acts chapter 15, you'll see that the apostles and disciples came together in Jerusalem to discuss the issue. They concluded that the gentiles should not be troubled with the proposition made by the Pharisees. The apostle Peter said that this was a yoke that they nor even their fore-fathers were able to bear. Since this was the case, then this said first century circumstance is evidence (in addition to Zech 11:10-14 et.al.) proving that Christ DID fulfill the law on the cross and that not all of the jots and tittles remain mandated from the law of Moses for the NT converts. If the apostles' decision was incorrect, then the apostles and new testament converts would all have been in violation of the law! Although, they were not in violation. The apostles finally understood the bigger purpose of Messiah/Christ when He spoke to them after HIs resurrection, recorded in Luke 24:25-27, 43-47 when He called them "fools!". In Hebrews 10:1-8, one of the apostles (who wrote the book of Hebrews) explained one of the changes in the covenant in more detail. (BTW: The book of Hebrews was specifically written to the Hebrew people - the Israelites, not to the gentiles.)
Hebrews 10:1-14 reads,
I want to point out one very important aspect to Hebrews 10:1-18 that you might not have noticed. Reread verse 14. I'll re-quote it from a different translation in hope for a clearer and better understanding: "For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are BEING set-apart." Verse 14 infers two camps of people: people that are BEING set apart and people that are NOT being set-apart. This is key to understanding why the sacrifices will be re-instated for the second resurrected group of people prophesied in the book of Ezekiel. The people that arise in the second resurrection have not accepted Messiah's sacrifice and their faith yet needs to be established.
HIS WILL AND TESTAMENT Please understand what a TESTAMENT is. It is a WILL. Most people write a will before they die. And, normally a dead person's will/testament has stipulations placed upon the heir recipients. The NT is Messiah's "will" and He placed stipulations within it. I want to show you from scripture that the NT is actually a WILL. Please read Luke 22:29 and examine one of the Greek words. Messiah was speaking to His disciples in Luke 22:29. It reads:
Other bible translations say "assign" or "appoint" rather than "covenant". Although, the Greek word is, "diatithemi" and according to Strong's Concordance, it means:
If we want eternal life (a share in the inheritance), we must follow the stipulations of Messiah's testament/will. Messiah is the One who owns everything now since it has been given to Him by His Father in Heaven.
In John 3:35-36 Messiah said:
Yahushua Messiah was given the entire creation by His Heavenly Father (Colossians 1:16, Hebrews 1:2). Messiah is the possessor of all and it is by Him and through Him that the saints shall receive their inheritance. Colossians 3:24 reads,
Messiah's will/testament possesses stipulations in order to become an heir: 1) We must believe that He came and believe what He said, and 2) We must obey His laws. If a person does not believe and obey, they are doomed to perish in His wrath at the end time, or at any-time He deems their wickedness is enough.
Psalms 2:10-12 speaks to the kings and rulers of the earth and verse 12 reads,
There are laws that are mandated within the NT. These same laws were in affect for Abraham to obey; because if we obey and believe, Abraham becomes our father (ref: Gal 3:7). This means that Abraham observed them before we did since he is our forefather within this NT contract. Abraham drank of the wine and ate of the bread long before we ever did (ref: Gen 14:18-19). And, Messiah said that Abraham saw His (Messiah's) day and rejoiced (ref: John 8:56). Additionally, we do know from Galatians 3 that there was a set of laws in affect BEFORE the 430 years since this is the first set of laws that the Israelites transgressed. I suspect that this is why YHWH allowed the Israelites to become slaves in Egypt. Nevertheless; Abraham believed and obeyed a set of laws before the covenant/s in the desert occurred (ref: Gen 26:5). These same core set of laws that Abraham obeyed in Genesis are essentially the same for NT believers. (I will demonstrate OT scriptures in the subsequent section.)
WHAT ARE THE NATURAL LAWS INCUMBANT UPON ALL OF MANKIND FOUND IN GENESIS? In this section, I will dissect the OT laws within Genesis. Firstly recapitulating: Galatians 3:16-19 informs us that a "law" was added 430 years later (Ex 12:40-41) and was in affect UNTIL the Messiah came. It was added because the Israelites sinned. (Keep in mind, sin is the transgression of a law. Ref: 1John 3:4. You cannot "sin" if there is no law.) So, let's look at what law/s were in affect before the 430 years by looking at story demonstration in Genesis.
There are two types of laws: natural laws and mandated laws. Mandated laws can also be natural laws. But, natural laws are not always mandated.
There were mandated laws upon mankind that are not conveniently listed for us in Genesis. The demonstrated list that I created above is not an exhaustive list. But, it gives a good general picture of the ten commandments (love toward YHWH and love toward your neighbor), the holy days, and dietary laws that were obviously in affect.
In Genesis 6:3 YHWH said, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever in his going astray..." (v:5) "YHWH saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." GOING ASTRAY? Yes, a deviation from the mandates of YHWH Elohim which amounts to a deviation from YHWH Himself. Man was created in the image of Elohim and mankind was to maintain that image. However, as we know, YHWH destroyed mankind from the earth except for Noah and his family due to the audacious deviation.
2Peter 2:5 informs us that Noah was a preacher, a righteous man. Therefore, he preached before and after the flood - educating everyone about the laws of YHWH. People were without excuse. They were knowledgeable of what was right and wrong. They also had the spirit of what was good and evil passed down from Adam and Eve when the two ate of the forbidden fruit.
Now consider Lot, the nephew of Abraham in Genesis 18-19. YHWH Elohim came down from heaven because the SINS of Sodom and Gomarrah had become "grievous." (Sin is the violation of the law. Consequently, the story of Sodom and Gomarrah necessitates a set of laws. Again, ref: 1John 3:4) In Genesis 19:9, we're informed that Lot was accustomed to 'judging' the said towns people. And, they were quite weary of it. Lot obviously knew the laws of YHWH and he was accustomed to preaching. Sodom and Gomarrah were also without an excuse before YHWH rained down their death punishment.
WHAT ABOUT THE ANIMAL OFFERINGS IN GENESIS? Romans 5:12 informs us that sin and DEATH entered the world when Adam and Eve sinned. There was actually a period of time when death was nonexistent in Genesis. This includes the death of animals. Adam and Eve clothed themselves with fig leaves after they ate of the forbidden fruit - realizing they were naked (ref: Gen 3:7). Death of an animal was foreign to them. But, the fig leaves were not adequate. In Genesis 3:21, we're told that YHWH Elohim made coats of skin for the man and woman, to dress them. YHWH Elohim was the first to slay an animal, and He mostly likely killed the animal in front of Adam and Eve since Abel later knew how it was done. It must have been a shock to them. YHWH used the animal skin to cover their shame (ref: Gen 2:25, 3:7). Just think, clothing came vogue with sin.
YHWH doesn't like the death of animals as was already noted from Psalms 40:6-9. He doesn't like death at all. He is the Elohim of LIFE. Eventually, death will be swallowed-up in the victory of life in the end (ref: 1Cor 15:54-55, Isaiah 25:8-9).
The death of the animal and the skin covering by YHWH in Genesis typified the death of Christ and the covering of HIS blood (ref: Romans 3:23-25; 5:8, Heb 9:14-15, 1Peter 1:18-23). It's important to be Spiritually clothed by YHWH Elohim and not try to cloth ourselves as like Adam and Eve tried. For Zephaniah prophesied and warned people who choose to wear foreign garments at the end time. Zephaniah 1:6-8 reads,
WHAT ARE THE NT CONTRACT LAWS? What are the NT contract laws? As Christians we ought to know. We signed the contract sort-of-speak through baptism and the Passover symbols, so we ought to know what the contract reads.
In Matthew 19:16-24, a young rich man came to Christ and asked Him, "What good shall I do to have everlasting life?" And Christ answered the young rich man and the conversation continued as follows:
The commandments Christ cited were five of the ten commandments that were written by the finger of God on the two tablets of stone on Mount Sinai. Christ left out the tenth commandment, "thou shalt not covet" and the first four commandments. Since the young rich man was unable to forsake his material goods and wealth, the young man violated the tenth commandment, "thou shalt not covet." Additionally, this said violation also violated the first four commandments - love toward God. The young rich man valued his possessions and wealth more than he did YHWH. The love of his possessions and wealth prevented him from following Christ - who was God (Theos) incarnate. (Ref: John 1:14, 6:46, 8:38, 14:9, 17:5,21, 20:28 )
Many Sunday observing Christians look at Matthew 19:16-24 and say, "The seventh day Sabbath isn't mentioned here, so it means we don't have to observe it in order to receive everlasting life." Is this true? Matthew 12:8 says that Messiah is the Master of the Sabbath. He rules over it. Does this sound like a day that isn't important? Not hardly. In Mark 2:27, Messiah said that the Sabbath was made for man. Did you catch that? The Sabbath was made for MAN, not just for the Jews, not just for those ancient Israelites. What was the reason YHWH gave to the Israelites for keeping the seventh day Sabbath anyway? Exodus 20:11 provides the answer: YHWH said that in six days He made the heavens and the earth, the sea, etc., and then rested on the seventh day. YHWH doesn't need to rest like we humans. BUT! He is not above His own law. He too observes it. HE RESTED! And, this occurred BEFORE those ancient Israelites were even born! In Hebrews 4:9, we're told that the observance of the Sabbath remains for the people of God. The Greek word used in Hebrews 4:9 is: "sabattismos." This does NOT mean Sunday worship! Additionally, the book of Hebrews was written TO THE HEBREWS. When the Hebrews read these words in chapter 4, verse 9, they certainly would not think of Sunday, the first day of the week. They naturally would understand that the Sabbath being spoken of here is the seventh day of the week.
Please know, the seventh day Sabbath is considered a NATURAL law as like the law of gravity. I don't have time and space to delve very deeply in this area. However, scientists have proven cycles of seven in the human body. This type of study is called, "chronobiology." You are welcome to read the book titled, "The Secrets Our Body Clock Reveal" by Susan Perry and Jim Dawson.
Since we've learned that the ten commandments are incumbent upon NT believers, let's revisit Matthew 5. Christ made two of the ten commandments more binding: murder and adultery. Not only are we expected to observe the letter of the law, but we are now expected to observe the spirit of the law. In other words, He magnified the law. This magnification was prophesied in Isaiah 42:21 to occur.
Notice in certain key verses such as Matthew 5:22, 5:28, 5:39 (but not limited too) Messiah says, "but I say to you...". He spoke with authority when He amended the laws. Moses never spoke like this. At one time only did Moses say "we" (in reference to himself and Aaron his brother) and for doing so, Moses was punished. He was prevented from entering the promised land. (Ref: Num 20:7-13). No man has the right to add or subtract from YHWH laws (Ref: Deut 4:2 and 12:32.) However, Messiah added to (amended) the laws and He spoke with authority when He did so. Again, He said, "but I say to you...". (Messiah was not just a glorified prophet as some people have demoted Him to be.)
In John 13:34, Messiah said that He gave us a new commandment. (Again, Messiah added to the law. Hence, He must have been God incarnate.) John 13:34 reads,
We're not only mandated to love our neighbor, but now we're mandated to lay our life down for one another. Messiah magnified the LOVE commandment as like He did the murder and adultery commandments.
1Corintians 10:1-11 gives us more information concerning what is within the NT contract and it ties into the ten commandments that I have delineated above. 1Corintians 10:1-11 tells us that the recorded story of the Israelites - while they were in the desert - are examples for us. We should not be idolaters, commit whoring, or try Messiah.
What about the Holy Days mentioned in Leviticus 23 and Deuteronomy 16; do we observe these days? The answer to this posed question is somewhat tricky, but not entirely.
The remaining Holy days; the day of atonement and the feast of tabernacles/booths, are not readily mentioned in the NT as being observed. However, YHWH's Holy days and feasts reveal His plan for all of mankind. Therefore, the holy days and feasts are a whole package. We can't disconnect the spring Holy days (foreshadowing Messiah - the first-fruit and the first resurrected saints) from the fall Holy days (foreshadowing the second resurrection). Besides, in the book of Zechariah, there is a prophesy that informs us that after Messiah returns, the gentiles are required to travel to Jerusalem and keep the feast of booths. If they don't they will not have any rain (ref: Zech 14:16-18). This time period appears to be during the 1,000 year period after Messiah returns, but BEFORE the second resurrection - before the covenant of peace is instituted.
In the OT, there were three feast periods. The "feasts" were actual agricultural harvest festivals. As NT Christians, we're not obligated to attend a feast in Jerusalem with a tenth of our agricultural harvest. Firstly, most of us don't even live in the promised land and have farms. Secondly, we're presently in a Diaspora period. Thirdly, these agricultural harvests foreshadowed the full reality of what YHWH really expects. OT Israel grew "physical-fruit". However, NT believers are expected to grow "Spiritual-"fruit." Galatians 5:22-23 provides a list of fruits we are expected to grow. Hence, the physical agricultural feasts were part of the schoolmaster (Gal 3:24) to educate us about the reality of what YHWH really wants. He is not too interested in receiving produce from the land. (He already owns everything.) He is interested in harvesting mankind. Now please notice the NT language. The following are examples, but are not limited to:
If we don't grow the Spiritual fruits listed in Galatians 5:22-23 during this Diaspora period, we won't be harvested and brought into the House of YHWH (Ref: Exodus 34:26) at the return of Messiah. Will the physical harvests be incumbent upon the saints when Messiah returns? No. The saints will no longer be in a physical state of being. They will be like Messiah - a Spiritual being. (Ref: Col 3:4, Phil 3:20-21, and Dan 12:2-3)
I'll make a list of some additional changes/alterations from the OT to the NT:
The NT Christians are also expected to observe the natural laws found in Genesis. Although, I've already mentioned the seventh day Sabbath as being one of the natural laws set in-motion in Genesis. The natural laws are part of the mandated laws set-forth in Genesis for all of mankind to obey. These same laws were reiterated in the covenants given by Moses.
DISSECTING THE COVENANTS IN THE DESERT There were two covenants (contracts) given during the wilderness journey: the Horeb covenant and the Moab covenant. This section of this study will demonstrate where these two said covenants are, and what is essentially contained in each covenant. I will present the over picture, but will refrain from all of the details. Every detail of each covenant is beyond the scope and purpose of this study. I'll begin with the covenant given in Horeb since it was the first one given in the wilderness.
THE HOREB COVENANT The Horeb covenant contains the ten commandments and begins in Exodus 19:3 and ends in Exodus 24:11.
There is a passage of text in Exodus that is missing in the Masoretic scroll, but it exists in the Dead Sea Scrolls and it is actually confirmed in the Deuteronomy Masoretic scroll. I will quote the Dead Sea Scrolls bible to start. In Exodus 19:9, YHWH told the people that He was going to make a covenant with all the people (referring to the Horeb covenant.) From the Dead Sea Scrolls Bible, Exodus 19:9 reads,
Again, you won't find the above quoted text in your standard bible which is based on the Masoretic text dated from about the second to fourth century A.D. For whatever reason, it was omitted from the Masoretic scroll. But, you'll find reference to this said passage in Deut 5:3-5. Therefore it is legitimate. YHWH's words, quoted above, is the prelude to the ten commandments (the decalogue) of the Horeb covenant.
YHWH told Moses He/Himself was going to make this covenant, and He told Moses to prepare all of the people for the event. After three days of preparation, YHWH thundered the decalogue covenant in the hearing of all the people. These are the ONLY laws that were directly spoken by YHWH in the hearing of all of the Israelites. At this point in the story, the Israelites wanted YHWH to stop speaking to them. They wanted Moses to speak in the place of YHWH. YHWH agreed and then He spoke to Moses and told Moses to tell the people the statutes and judgments. The statutes and judgments primarily contain human relation laws, but not exclusively. There are some that pertain to a responsibility to YHWH. And, you will also find the three feasts. However, there is absolutely no laws within the Horeb covenant that pertain to the priests or the Levites. And, nothing is said about animal sacrifices for sin.
The Horeb covenant, which can also be termed as both the Decalogue Covenant and/or the Creator's Covenant, begins in Exodus 19:3 and ends in Exodus 24:11. This covenant was sealed when the blood of bulls was sprinkled on both the altar and on the people. The Horeb covenant can be established from start to finish. The additional sacrificial laws and other like laws were not in the Horeb contract. There were a whole host of other laws given while they were encamped about Mt. Sinai, but because they were not contained within this said covenant, it is of considerable importance. (These additional set of laws will be discussed later.)
YHWH can enact laws, but He is not obligated to place them within a contract form. For example, YHWH didn't contract the ten commandments with Abraham, Isaac or Jacob.
In Deuteronomy 5:1-22, the ten commandments are listed. But, in verses 2-4 it reads,
YHWH didn't contract the ten commandments (the decalogue) with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. But, this doesn't mean that the decalogue laws were not applicable or mandatory during their time. The word, "covenant" is simply an old English word that means "contract". A covenant/contract is a binding agreement between two parties: you do this, I do that. For example: YHWH didn't contract with Abraham and say: if you don't steal, I will do a.b.c and d for you. When YHWH contracted the decalogue covenant with the Israelites, YHWH's obligation essentially was this: "if you diligently obey My voice and shall guard My covenant, then you shall be My treasured possession above all the peoples - for all the earth is Mine - and you shall be to Me a reign of priests and a set-apart nation." (Ref: Exodus 19:5-6. Although, there are some other obligations that YHWH placed upon Himself such as what is stated in Exodus 23:25-27. It outlines some blessings that the Israelites would receive if they obeyed His voice.)
As like Deuteronomy 5:2 informs us, the decalogue covenant was given in Horeb. Therefore, consider Malachi 4:4-6. It reads,
Based upon Malachi 4:4-6 (as like other scriptures), the decalogue covenant given in Horeb is important and must be remembered along with its statutes and judgments. However, this covenant is interesting because it has two separable parts. The first part contains the decalogue spoken by YHWH. The second part contains the statutes and judgments. Now, notice what Deuteronomy 5:22 says about the ten commandments:
After YHWH spoke the ten commandments, He added no more words?, commandments? Why does it say, "He added no more?" Deut 5:23-31 provides the answer. In verse 31, YHWH told Moses that the additional commands, statutes and judgments were to be followed when they ENTERED THE LAND. Therefore; the additional commandments, statutes and judgments (the second half of the Horeb covenant) appear to be only connected to the promised land.
Additionally, only the decalogue - the words that YHWH spoke - were written on the tablets of stone by the finger of YHWH. The rest; the statutes, judgments, and remaining commandments were written by Moses on (most likely) animal skins. The tablets of stone containing the ten commandments, were placed INSIDE of the ark-of-the-covenant. (Ref: Ex 25:16, Deut 10:4-5, 1Kings 8:9) The two tablets of stone were the only items placed inside of the ark. The other teachings/commandments etc, were placed BESIDE of the ark as a witness against them!! (ref: Deut 31:26)
The ark itself is specifically called, "THE ARK OF THE COVENANT." (Ref: Num 10:33, 14:44, Deut 10:8 etc.) The tablets of stone are what give the ark it's name. Notice Exodus 34:28 for example. This was the second time Moses was atop the mountain. Exodus 34:28 reads, "And he (Moses) was there with YHWH forty days and forty nights. He did not eat bread and he did not drink water. And, He (YHWH) wrote on the tablets the Words of the covenant, the Ten Words." This verse (as like others) seem to confine the "covenant" to the tablets of stone.
Although soon afterward, the Israelites broke the Horeb decalogue covenant by making and worshipping the golden calf while Moses went atop the mountain. This breach of contract was represented when Moses came down from the mountain, threw the two tablets of stone down on the ground, and the tablets broke. However, BEFORE Moses went atop the mountain to fetch the first tablets of stone (the ones Moses broke in pieces), YHWH told Moses that He knew that the Israelites didn't possess a right heart in order for them to keep the decalogue covenant (ref: Deut 5:26-31). The Israelites physically prepared for three days (by washing their garments) before the decalogue covenant was given, but they did not prepare their hearts. Because YHWH understood their hearts, YHWH gave them more commandments. This aspect will be discussed further in the Moab covenant section below.
THE MOAB COVENANT Deuteronomy contains the Moab covenant. It was signed 40 years after the Israelites left Egypt. Deut 29:1 informs us of this additional covenant, the covenant made in the land of Moab. For Deut 29:1 reads,
The covenant YHWH Elohim made with the Israelites in Moab was forty years after the Horeb covenant (ref: Deut 1:1-5). Many of the older generation had passed away at this time. Moses reiterated many of the laws with all the people who were left alive including the children who were born in the desert, right before they entered the promised land. He reiterated the laws by retelling the exodus story and the Mount Sinai events. However, many levitical laws, sacrificial laws and other laws that pertained to the land (example, but not limited to: Deut 26:1-2) are found within the Moab covenant. These said "laws" are the same laws that were given to the first generation who came out of Egypt while they were encamped about Mount Sinai. [Please know that the Israelites arrived at Mount Sinai on the first day of the third month (Ex. 19:1) and didn't leave that area until almost a year later (ref: Num 10:11-13).]
The name of the book of "Deuteronomy", where you'll find the Moab Covenant, is actually a Greek word. The word came from the Septuagint and it means, "Second Law". But, the Hebrew words for the book are, "mishneh hattorah hazzoth" and means: "a copy of this law." Because, most of this book is a review of the laws in the previous volumes: Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. For thirty-seven days Moses talks: recalling, reminding, rebuking, warning, promising; about the revelation at Sinai and their journeys through the desert, about spies and wars and victories and the Land and about what it's like to serve as a leader of God's chosen people.
Although, the Moab covenant essentially contains the same levitical laws, sacrificial laws, etc., as what were commanded of them in and around Mount Sinai, these said laws were explained again to them in the land of Moab (ref: Deut 1:5b). Paraphrased; the terms of the Moab covenant originated on and around mount Sinai while the Israelites encamped there for almost a year. Although; technically, the final signing of the Moab covenant wasn't until 40 years later in Moab. For this reason, its called the MOAB COVENANT. I suspect one of the reasons why the second covenant wasn't "signed" until right before they entered the land is because there are laws contained in this covenant that were not applicable UNTIL they entered the land. Examples are - but not limited to: the land rest laws and the feasts - when they reaped their harvests.
Now; with the understanding that the terms of the Moab covenant were given around Mount Sinai, Galatians 4 makes more sense. In this said passage, the Apostle Paul compared the OT covenant with the NT covenant. The Apostle Paul referred to the terms of the Moab covenant - given at Mount Sinai - rather than the ten commandments which are the natural laws found in Genesis. Galatians 4:21-26 reads,
I will now repeat a few referenced scriptures and a statement that I previously made that solidifies the point made in Galatians 4:21-26. The tablets of stone containing the ten commandments, were placed INSIDE of the ark-of-the-covenant. (Ref: Ex 25:16, Deut 10:4-5, 1Kings 8:9) The two tablets of stone were the only items placed inside of the ark. The other teachings/commandments etc, were placed BESIDE of the ark as a witness against them! (ref: Deut 31:26) This ties in with Galatians 3 which I will discuss in further detail in the next section.
The Israelites were given all the additional laws (additions to the decalogue) due to their sins (Ez 20:6-25, Jer 7:22-24). They were enslaved with these set of laws; especially, the fleshly sacrificial laws. Every time they sinned, DEATH was in their face.
Ezekiel 20:6-25 reads (from the online Jewish/Hebrew bible):
If you didn't catch the significance of verse 25, please re-read it. YHWH gave specific laws to the Israelites, knowing they could not keep all of these said laws so that they would die. The Moab covenant was a curse. For this main reason, I believe the ancient Israelites termed the Moab covenant the "death-covenant." Although, the death of animals was mostly likely the secondary reason why the Israelites termed the Moab covenant, the "death-covenant" in Isaiah 28:14-18. Please notice what Deut 27:26 says when the Moab Covenant was being established: "CURSED is he that confirmeth not the words of this law to do them. And all the people shall say, 'Amen.'" YHWH put a curse on the Israelites by establishing the Moab covenant! The apostle Paul quoted Deut 27:26 (this last said verse) in Galatians 3:10 when he was speaking of the "law" that was added 430 years later. (I will discuss Galatians 3 in further detail in the next section.)
The covenant YHWH Elohim made with the Israelites in Moab is the covenant that was most notably annulled at the death of Messiah (Zechariah 11:10-14). It was held AGAINST THEM! (Again ref: Deut 31:26). If the Moab covenant wasn't annulled, they would not be given another chance to live again. But, we know from additional scriptures, these stiff-necked Israelites will be given another chance to live (ref: Ez 37). YHWH doesn't take delight in death. Therefore, the Moab covenant had to be annulled. Technically, since the One who became Messiah is the One who covenanted with the Israelites in the desert, both the Moab and the Horeb covenants are no longer in affect since Messiah died. However; Malachi 4:4-6 did NOT tell us to remember the covenant made in Moab, just the one in Horeb. Therefore, those laws are important to YHWH. Moreover, we've already seen examples in Genesis where the decalogue commandments were already in affect. Although; they were not placed in a contract form within Genesis - at least it wasn't recorded as such. Therefore, the decalogue laws were not solely confined to the Horeb covenant. But; because YHWH commanded these laws Himself and Moses wrote them down, we have a nice concise, easy to read list. Additionally, Messiah conversed with a rich young man who asked what laws he needed to keep in order to obtain eternal life. Messiah cited some of the decalogue laws (ref: Matt 19:17-22). The decalogue laws are now applicable and mandatory within the NT contract. These decalogue laws are a part of 'HIS WILL' and always have been. These laws - if obeyed - can transform you back into the image of YHWH Elohim.
Are all of the laws found in the Moab covenant "bad" laws? No, of course not. The laws were not bad, the people were faulty (ref: Heb 8:7-13). 2 Timothy 3:15-16 reads,
There are many laws in the Moab covenant that work well for a society's civil code for example. And, there are many laws that work well for personal relationships for another example. I am not going to take the time to delineate all of the laws in the Moab covenant. However, the Moab and the Horeb covenants are a good reference source for righteous living. And, they are a reference source for YHWH's appointments. We know that Genesis 1:14 informs us that one of the reasons for the creation of the Sun and Moon is for YHWH's appointments. But, how do we know when the appointments are if we don't reference the terms of the Moab covenant? Although, the wilderness covenants are no longer an agreement between Israel and Elohim: if you do A.B.C., I'll do D.E. and F.
YOU CANNOT ADD OR SUBTRACT FROM THE TERMS OF A CONTRACT/COVENANT AFTER IT HAS BEEN SIGNED Once a contract is written and signed by all the parties involved, you cannot add to it or take away from it. (Ref: Gal 3:15) There are only two ways a contract can become null and void. 1) The contract is fulfilled, and 2) one of the parties dies. (In the case of both of the OT wilderness covenants, both situations occurred in the NT.) A contract is a binding agreement. Therefore, no one can say that the Moab covenant or the Horeb covenant remains in affect, but then change some of the terms within the agreement. For example: we can't just take the sacrificial laws out (Psalm 40:6-9) and say that the covenant/s remain in affect. And, for those of you that might not know, the Horeb covenant (the one containing the ten commandments) mentions the Passover lamb sacrifice in the statutes and judgments (ref: Ex 23:18). You can't say that we no longer sacrifice a lamb, but then say that the Horeb covenant remains in affect. Furthermore, why would YHWH say in the OT in many places that He will make a NEW covenant with the Israelites. Why not just use the old covenant/s? (Jer 31:31, Hebrews 8:8, Ez 37:27 and more.) Again, because you can't change even one term of the covenant/contract and say it remains in affect. (Deut 4:2, 12:32, Prov 30:6, Deut 27:26)
Neither the Moab or the Horeb contract include a new heart and a new Spirit within the terms of the contracts. This missing term is a MUST! Moreover, the Moab covenant says quite the opposite! (Ref: Deut 29:4, Rom 11:8-10, Acts 28:27-28). Therefore, both wilderness covenants should not be considered the end-all desirable contracts. Although, if you really wish to believe that one or both of the Moab or Horeb contracts remain in affect, you need to keep every jot and tittle or else you are under the curse stated in Deut 27:26. (Again, ref: (Deut 4:2, 12:32, Prov 30:6)
WHAT "LAW" WAS ADDED AFTER THE 430 YEARS (Galatians 3:16-19)? I've studied Galatians 3:16-19 in depth and read many scriptures that I believe pertain to this said passage. I've read what other people have theorized, and I found flaws in their conclusions. Too many people have tried to fit their own pet doctrinal stance in Galatians 3:16-19 and have missed the obvious.
The "LAW" that was added after 430 years later was firstly the Passover sacrifice law. (Ref: Ex 12:40-43). The name "Passover" itself originated when YHWH passed-over the Israelites' homes in Goshen (Ex 12:13, 26-27), the homes that possessed the lambs' blood on the door posts and lintel. For this reason, "Passover" wasn't observed before that time. The lamb died in place of the first-born Israelites. And, please know that the entire nation of Israel was YHWH's first-born (ref: Ex 4:22-23). If those ancient Israelites did not put the lambs' blood on the door posts and lintel, they ALL would have perished. Liken this to what the high priest said before Messiah died: John 11:50 reads, "...consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not." The lamb was the mere proxy before Yahushua Messiah (Jesus Christ).
SKEPTICAL? IT IS A BIT MORE INVOLVED. Let's keep Galatians 3:16-19 in its context. In the first part of the chapter, the Apostle Paul chastised the Galatians for reverting from "faith" to fleshly works. But, he also termed it "works of the law". And, in the first verse, Paul reminds them of Messiah's crucifixion. So thus far, we ought to ask: what works of law that pertain to FLESH, were nailed to the cross?
In verse 13, Paul wrote: "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree." DEATH was actually the curse of the law (not hanging on the tree and remaining alive). Nevertheless, we were redeemed from death - actually eternal death. So, just what specific fleshly works of law pertained to death were the Galatians doing? These Galatians were DOING something that once was a "law", pertained to death, and pertained to flesh, but Paul didn't think it was now proper to continue. He obviously thought what they were doing demonstrated a lack of faith.
Since Messiah redeemed the Israelites from death, they were no longer required to put an animal to death in their place. Messiah died in their place. The Passover sacrifice is no longer required. It was only meant as a proxy until Messiah came, but the Passover law was given because the Israelites disobeyed other laws previously in affect. As like I pointed out before in Ezekiel 20:6-25, YHWH told the Israelites to forsake the idols of Egypt before they left Egypt. But, they ignored YHWH's mandate. Because the Israelites refused to obey His voice, YHWH gave them a bunch of fleshly laws, works-of-law to perform. They needed some hands-on experience, in your face training. Jeremiah also demonstrates this fact as like Ezekiel 20:6-25 did. Jeremiah 7:22-24 reads,
Plan "A" sort-of-speak didn't involve fleshly sacrifices. But, due to the Israelites rebellion before they even left Egypt, plan "B" involving animal sacrifices was set in motion.
THERE IS MORE TO BE SAID ABOUT GALATIANS 3. In Galatians 3, Paul began speaking a lot about Abraham. Paul wrote that the inheritance was given by a promise and the promised inheritance was to come through Messiah. Firstly, what was the promised inheritance? The promised land! The promised land was primarily promised to Messiah, and everyone else is required to go through Him to receive a portion of it. (Ref: Colossians 1:16, Hebrews 1:2, Colossians 3:24) Notice what Messiah said to the Israelites about His inheritance in Jeremiah 2:7 - before He became the Messiah in the flesh:
Since the land inheritance was instituted by a promise primarily for Yahushua Messiah who would be ruler and King over it, a law that was given afterward to the Israelites could not annul that promise. Why did the Apostle Paul even speak about an annulment anyway? Because, all of the animal sacrifices and the Moab covenant were annulled. Please understand: before the Israelites were even allowed out of Egypt and were able to travel to the promised land, they had to perform the Passover sacrifice. If they didn't, they would have perished. Therefore, the entry into the promised land was indirectly contingent upon the Passover sacrifice.
The Passover law was given exactly 430 years later as like Exodus 12:40-43 demonstrates and as like the apostle Paul referenced in Galatians 3:17. And, the terms of the Moab covenant (which included animal sacrifices) were given at Mount Sinai during the 430th year which was also annulled. Galatians 3:19 and 24 reads,
The Passover lamb typified Messiah (John 1:29, Jer 11:17-23) as did the other animal sacrifices (Heb 10:4-7). Although, the animal sacrifices were not the only trainer aspect of the covenant. The harvest festivals represented the plan of YHWH for mankind. For one example out of a manifold: In John 4:34-36, Messiah spoke to His disciples and used the field and harvest analogy to convey the salvation message.
The Passover lamb sacrifice, the rest of the animal sacrifices, and other aspects of the law were used to train the Israelites. In other words, it was their schooling. But, at a certain designated point in time, the school bell rang and that school session was over. Yahushua Messiah came and picked-up certain individuals from the school yard sort of speak. We must now operate in the real world. YHWH wanted the Israelites to understand the bigger picture - the ultimate fulfillment. For Hebrews 10:1 says,
Yahushua Messiah redeemed us unto life - unlike the little lamb that couldn't even save itself from death. Nor could it prolong the life of the Israelites even for one day. We are now required to accept HIS sacrifice (in place of the little lamb and the rest of the sacrifices) or else we will not be lead out of this world (which typifies Egypt) into His glorious Kingdom.
LAST BUT NOT LEAST, THE THIRD COVENANT SPOKEN OF IN EZEKIEL - "THE COVENANT OF PEACE" As most bible students know, the prophesies contained in the book of Ezekiel regarding the third temple speak about the establishment of animal sacrifices. Because animal sacrifices will be required in the third temple (the temple that will be established by Messiah), and because physical circumcision will also be required (ref: Ez 44:1-9), many (once-upon-a-time) NT believers have questioned the validity of the NT. For example: one woman I know of claims that YHWH loves animal sacrifices, that the old covenant has not be annulled, and that the NT is full of lies. She bases her three said claims on Ezekiel's prophesies regarding the animal sacrificial requirements. All of her three claims are incorrect. I've already presented scriptures from the OT demonstrating that the old wilderness covenant has been annulled; consequently, validating the NT. However, I am prepared to present further proof that YHWH does not like the animal sacrifices even though he will re-establish them. But, I will also demonstrate that Ezekiel's prophesy, which speak of the animal sacrifices, is actually a different and separate covenant. This futuristic covenant occurs at the time of the second resurrection. The ancient Israelites will rise (in the physical form) from their graves as like all the rest of the human race will (with the exception of the first resurrected saints). This eclectic group of people will need to go-through the schooling process and graduate before they will be given life eternal. Of course; they must pass the schooling process and become believers, or they will experience the second and final death (ref: Rev 2:11, 20:6,14). Even the beloved Abraham wasn't exempt from a schooling process. Abraham passed the curriculum set-forth for him, and he will be raised from the dead in the first resurrection (ref: Matt 8:11, Luke 13:28). He will never again be required to offer an animal for sins. He will no longer be in the flesh, but rather he will be composed of spirit (ref: Dan 12:2-3, Acts 24:15, Matt 22:30).
YHWH DOES NOT LIKE ANIMAL SACRIFICES (Despite the opinions of people) YHWH is an Elohim of life. He does not like death as like I pointed out in a previous section. But, He chose to use "death" as a teaching tool for the Israelites. Sadly, the Israelites miss-interpreted the animal sacrificial lessons. The animal sacrifices and physical rituals became the zenith of their worship and spiritual life rather than the decalogue spoken and written by YHWH. Isaiah 1:11-12,16-17 reads,
I've been told that YHWH will love the sacrifices once the Israelites obey the decalogue. I disagree. Firstly, YHWH made all of the animals and He loves life and His creation. Secondly, there isn't one scripture to support this said supposition. To the contrary, two scriptures plainly and unequivocally say that YHWH does NOT delight in the blood of animals.
EZEKIEL'S PROPHESY, THE COVENANT OF PEACE AND THE THIRD TEMPLE The first place in scripture where the "covenant of peace" is mentioned is in Numbers 25:10-13. Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest turned YHWH's wrath away from the Israelites because he killed both a prince of the Simeonites and a Midianitish whore the he was with. Because of this act of atonement, YHWH promised Phinehas that He would give Phinehas and Phinehas's seed His covenant-of-peace. Phinehas was then also promised an everlasting priesthood. It will be his lineage that will be the Levite priests within the covenant of peace (ref: Ez 48:11, 44:1-15). And, this covenant of peace will occur at the second resurrection.
The ancient Israelites will arise from their graves as fleshly beings again. Although; this new covenant will include a new heart and YHWH's Spirit within them, unlike either of the other two covenants given in the wilderness. The only two covenants/contracts that include a new heart and YHWH's Spirit within, are the NT life covenant and this covenant/contract of peace. This contract term is a MUST!
Ezekiel 37:1-27 is the well known passage that speaks about the valley of the dry bones that come alive again. Rather than quoting twenty-seven verses, I'll summarize and quote a few verses.
In Ezekiel 40:1 YHWH gave another vision to Ezekiel for the latter days, the vision of the new temple. The vision of the new temple came in the first month, on the tenth day of the month, in the 14th year after the city was smitten. The date of the vision is not just a coincidence with the Passover dates. If you recall, the Passover lamb was chosen and set-aside on the 10th day of the first month, then was slaughtered on the 14th day of the first month (ref: Ex 12). The timing of the temple vision demonstrates that YHWH will "pass-over" them again and forgive their sins. Perhaps, He might literally pass-over them when He resurrects them from the dust of the earth. And, perhaps - He might do it on the day of "Passover".
Animal sacrifices will be re-instituted for the temple during the second resurrection. Reference scriptures: Ez 40:42-43, 43:27, 45:16-25, 46:3-7, 46:13,20,24. Although, there is a very specific day and time period when the sacrifices will begin again. Ezekiel 43:27 reads, (speaking of the completion of the altar and temple)
The EIGHTH DAY is representative of the last eighth day in the plan of YHWH, the day that follows the feast of ingathering (ref: Lev 23:33-36, John 7:37). The last great day is said to be a "closing" festival. This is the time in YHWH's master plan for mankind when He will accept the Israelites and the rest of the nations of people who were previously cut-off (ref: Ez 47:22-23). He will accept anyone who is willing to concede to Yahushua Messiah the King.
IS THE DECALOGUE PART OF 'THE COVENANT OF PEACE'? If you read the book of Ezekiel and all of the places that speak about the covenant of peace, you won't find a list of the ten commandments. But, you will find animal sacrifices, circumcision of the flesh, the festivals, appointed times and the Sabbaths. However, there is indications that the decalogue will be in affect. For example: Ezekiel 36:25-27 says that they will be cleansed from their idols. This example covers the second commandment.
The decalogue comprises the natural laws that were instituted in Genesis. They are like a "how-to-operate manual." When we buy a machine, we normally read the instruction manual so that we know how to make the machine properly function. The decalogue is like a instruction manual, but for mankind. And, YHWH will use this instruction manual to judge the nations of people when He resurrects them. He doesn't need to make the decalogue part of the last covenant in order for the decalogue to be in affect. They were the natural laws from the beginning.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Before Adam and Eve sinned, life was good. No-one died including the animals. Although; we're told when Adam an Eve sinned, this is when DEATH entered the world (Rom 5:12). Adam and Eve attempted to cover their sinful shame by covering themselves with fig leaves. But, their own covering wasn't adequate. They needed their shame/sin covered by YHWH Elohim. Consequently, Elohim killed the first animal (foreshadowing Messiah's death) and gave them animal skin coverings to wear.
Since the time when Elohim slaughtered the first animal for sin; you'll find that the people who lived during OT times, sacrificed animals. Even Noah offered animals upon an altar (ref: Gen 8:20) after the flood. Sins prevailed before and after the flood. "Sin" necessitates law. Consequently, there were a set of laws established from the beginning in Genesis. These set of laws are the natural laws which include the decalogue commandments, the appointments with YHWH, and the dietary laws. YHWH can institute laws, but they don't have to be enclosed within a covenant/contract. For a comparative example, consider the law of gravity. It is a natural law and keeps the creation "grounded." This comparative example is a similitude of the other set of natural laws that govern relationships - man with man and man with Elohim.
YHWH's laws were known amongst mankind in Genesis. The majority were without an excuse. There are many examples that can be cited for this statement. But, one example that I haven't used thus far is this: Melchizedek was known as the King of Salem on earth, and He was a priest of the Most High El. Melchizedek spoke directly to Abraham amongst all of the other kings who Abraham saved because of his nephew Lot. The nations around Abraham were well aware of Elohim. They saw Melchizedek and knew who He was. In Genesis 23:6, the sons of Heth said to Abraham, "you are a prince of Elohim." Again, people were not ignorant of YHWH Elohim and His laws. For an example of consequence; Lot was a preacher in Sodom and Gomarrah, but YHWH said that their sins had become too grievous. So, YHWH destroyed Sodom and Gomarrah along with two other cities because they were weary of listening to Lot. They didn't have any intentions of changing their evil ways. Since "sin" prevailed in the OT before the Israelites encountered YHWH Elohim at Mount Sinai, the natural laws were in existence from the beginning. And, the people were without an excuse.
YHWH brought the Israelites out of Egypt. But; before He brought them out, YHWH told the Israelites to destroy their idols. They ignored the command from YHWH and He was angry with them. He wanted to destroy them all in Egypt, but for His Name sake and for the sake of the promise He made to Abraham (ref: Gen 15:13-16), He brought the Israelites out of Egypt into the wilderness.
At Mount Sinai, YHWH made the Horeb covenant with the Israelites. The terms of the Horeb covenant were mainly the decalogue commandments. They were spoken by the mouth of YHWH and written by the finger of YHWH. All of the other commandments came through Moses. The decalogue commandments were also the only ones placed INSIDE of the ark. All of the other laws were placed beside of the Ark as a witness against them. Most of all the other laws were terms within the Moab covenant. However, the Moab covenant signing didn't occur until forty years later by the Jordan River. But, the terms were given at and around Mount Sinai. The Moab covenant - specifically - was written against the Israelites. It wasn't in their favor. YHWH wanted the Israelites to die due to their stiff-necks, continual sins, and faithlessness. Notice the conversation between Moses and YHWH in Exodus 32 after the Israelites created the golden calf:
YHWH came and visited their sin upon them. He came via the Messiah in the first century. Yahushua Messiah didn't forgive their sins ( ref: John 9:39-41, Ps 69:21-28, Acts 13:45-48). The nation of Judah was destroyed forty years after Messiah arose from the grave. And, the Jews burned the temple.
There were many other people who's sins were forgiven; because they believed and obeyed Messiah and their shame/sins were/are covered by Messiah's blood. They don't need the proxy animals anymore. The OT covenants were annulled at the death of Messiah which included the sacrificial mandates. The OT covenants were annulled because Messiah is the ONE who entered into the contract with the ancient Israelites. Since He died, the OT contracts became null and void. So, the believers entered into a new covenant with Messiah. Actually, it wasn't brand new. It was the same contract made with Abraham. The contract symbols are the bread and the wine. And, Abraham partook of the bread and the wine as like do the NT believers. Messiah said, if we don't eat of His body - the bread, and drink of His blood - the wine, we don't have any LIFE in us. (Ref: Matt 26:26-28, John 6:53-58) And, we are expected to partake of these symbols during the night He was betrayed (ref: 1Cor 11:23-26). This LIFE contract with Abraham and the NT believers was not annulled at the death of Messiah (even though it was previously made before HIs death), because it was His "will" and "testament" contract. This type of contract could only take affect after the death of the Messiah - the covenanted One. (Ref: Isaiah 49:8, Hebrews 9:15-17)
The NT contract includes the natural laws found in Genesis. Although, we don't have a nice concise list of them in Genesis. But, we do have a list in the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy that we can reference. For this reason, we're told to remember the Horeb covenant (not the Moab covenant) lest YHWH Elohim comes and smites the earth with a curse. (Ref: Malachi 4:4-6). We can find most of these natural laws restated in the NT. Additionally, there are some good practical laws in both the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy that can be applied when dealing with our neighbor. Hence; don't forget, "all scripture was given by the inspiration of Elohim and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness." (Ref: 2Tim 3:16)
There are two large resurrection periods for mankind. The first resurrection comprises the believers in Messiah (also known as the saints) who also obey His words. The saints will arise as Spirit Beings and shine like the stars of heaven. But, only on the condition they don't blasphemy the Holy Spirit. The rest of mankind will arise in the second resurrection, but as fleshly beings again. They will be mandated to accept the covenant of peace contract or perish. (Ref: Daniel 12:2-3, Acts 24:15, Rev 20:4-13, 1Cor 15:35-51, Ezekiel 37:1-27) The second resurrection was only made possible for the ancient Israelites by the annulment of the Moab covenant - the death covenant. (Ref: Ez 20:25, Deut 27:26, 29:18-21, 31:16-30, Zechariah 11:10-14)
Some people today want to cling to the contract of death. Not even Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had ever entered such a covenant with YHWH. And, they'll be in the first resurrection! (Ref: Matt 8:11-12) Neither the Moab or the Horeb contract include a new heart and a new Spirit within the terms of the contracts. This missing term is a MUST! In fact, the Moab covenant says quite the opposite! (Ref: Deut 29:4, Rom 11:8-10, Acts 28:27-28). Therefore, both wilderness covenants should not be considered the end-all desirable contracts. Choose the LIFE covenant/contract while it remains available. If not; after the first resurrection, you'll have to settle for the Peace Covenant and live this fleshly life all over again. |
||